The Dutch are on the Wrong Side, Again
"Would we have protested if the resistance had blown up a school with German children?" - is the Dutch logic of supporting Israeli war crimes.
In the pallid bureaucratic language that cloaks moral cowardice, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof has made his nation's position clear: there is "no red line" that Israel can cross that would cause the Netherlands to alter its steadfast support. No war crime too heinous, no massacre too bloody, no humanitarian catastrophe too devastating will shake the Dutch government's resolve to stand with the executioners rather than the executed.
We have seen this moral failure before in Dutch history. The echoes of collaboration during the Nazi occupation now find their modern expression in the corridors of power in The Hague, where officials meticulously avoid condemning what the International Court of Justice—housed on their own soil—has deemed a plausible genocide.
When Israeli forces gun down aid workers distributing food to starving populations, the Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp mutters platitudes about "quiet diplomacy." The coward's refuge. The Netherlands bizarrely shifts blame to Ireland for speaking out against atrocities, as if moral clarity somehow provokes more violence rather than demands its cessation.
The Dutch government presents token gestures—promises to "monitor" military exports to Israel—while F-35 components continue flowing uninterrupted. This is the illusion of action, designed to pacify domestic critics while changing nothing of substance. Meanwhile, Dutch authorities violently suppress citizens protesting against the slaughter in Gaza, criminalizing dissent with the tired, cynical charge of “antisemitism.”
Orwellian: Portraying Israel as the Anti-Nazi Resistance
We have entered a new phase in this complicity. No longer content with merely denying Israel's war crimes through the tired fiction that every Palestinian casualty was a "human shield" or a "Hamas fighter," Dutch media platforms now openly justify these atrocities. Columnist Theodor Holman, writing in the popular mainstream newspaper ‘Het Parool’, defends the killing of aid workers by comparing Israel to Dutch resistance fighters in World War II. That's right, he compares Israel not to Anton Mussert and his Dutch Nazi collaborators of the NSB, but to the resistance against the Nazis—a perverse inversion that would make Orwell shudder.
My grandfathers, both of whom fought the Nazis—one Dutch and one Algerian who also fought against French colonizers—would turn in their graves.
"Would we have protested if the resistance had blown up a school with German children?" he asks, revealing the moral bankruptcy that has infected Dutch discourse. The answer is unequivocally yes—we condemn the bombing of Dresden as a war crime, and we condemn the indiscriminate killing of children regardless of who perpetrates it. The oppressed do not receive moral dispensation to become oppressors.
Let us be clear: this catastrophe did not begin on October 7th. It began with decades of occupation, of apartheid policies, of kidnappings of children into rape and torture dungeons, of strangulation and dehumanization. The attack on that day—itself most likely considered a war crime—has been used to justify a hundred thousand more extreme war crimes in response. The Netherlands stands on the wrong side of this moral equation, just as it has stood on the wrong side before.
The West Never Decolonized nor Denazified
As Martin Luther King Jr. reminded us, the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. History will remember those who spoke truth to power and those who enabled atrocities through their silence or active support. Almost every Western country now stands on the wrong side of history—not by accident, but by design. The West has never truly decolonized nor denazified itself.
The cultural rot of white supremacy and colonial thinking remains embedded in its institutions, its reflexes, its very DNA. This unexamined poison guarantees that Western nations will repeatedly choose the path of racism, apartheid, and genocide until the rest of the world musters the collective strength to say "enough." What we witness today is not an aberration but the predictable outcome of unresolved historical crimes that continue to shape our present.
- Karim
This article was inspired by the Dutch blog Frontaal Naakt—a must read for those who can read Dutch.
* To increase the visibility of BettBeat Media, your restack of this article would be greatly appreciated.
Currently, a dedicated group—less than 1% of our 3,000 subscribers—generously provides the financial foundation that keeps BettBeat accessible to all. We're profoundly grateful to these supporters whose commitment makes our work possible. By joining them as a paid subscriber, you demonstrate that BettBeat's journalism matters while strengthening our resolve to resist paywalling our content. Your support today helps us maintain our founding principle: quality analysis available to everyone, regardless of financial means. Honor the path these early supporters have blazed by becoming a paid subscriber—together, we can build a sustainable model that respects both our work and our community's diverse economic realities.
For Americans who grew up reading about the atrocities of Hitler and NOT reading about the role of the Soviets in defeating Hitler, the evidence of narrative construction is there in its crudest iteration.
While the American media celebrated the heroic boys who battled the Hun, the corporate power that exercised so much unelected power, kept hidden its full throttled support for the reviled Hitler. Nazism was kept in check, and the historical record would show that the Nazi regime would not be blamed on the German people, to the point that post war Germany would receive millions of American dollars to rebuild, and many of the leading strategists and engineers and officers of the Wehrmacht were recruited by American corporate headhunters.
Following the war, the offices of U.S. law enforcement were all targeting the ideology of the country that was decimated but not defeated by the Nazis. J. Edgar Hoover made it the job of the FBI to promote a virulent ant-communism campaign, and an alcoholic blowhard Senator from Wisconsin made his name by defaming and slandering writers and actors who recognized capitalism as hucksterism.
The corporate elite in America knew that the Nazis were kindred spirits who hated communism, and so racism, an observable cancer in the American population, wasn’t addressed as a criminal spore, but communism, the ideology of a minority of artists and intellectuals, became the obsession of American politics and pop culture, as the scourge that threatened all Americans.
The stories that have smothered American society from FDR to the present, have made the West dysfunctional and are still at work in international politics today. The Russians are nefarious, and the Europeans are superior! The Israelis are democrats, and the Palestinians are terrorists. As patently pathetic and simplistic as that sounds, it is the nonsense that guides western imperialism, and it is an ideology at odds with the supposed values that the west has preached for a couple of centuries.
Simply put, racial preference as a practice cannot be rooted from western culture as long as capitalism is never honestly acknowledged as an illegitimate and corrosive force.
It's gotten to the point where they can justify nuclear war. Excellent reporting.