Yale Welcomes Gun-Slinging Zionist Torturer with Child Bride Past
Exposing the Ivy League Fraud, Episode 2: How Yale masquerades as a bastion of ethics while welcoming criminals deemed 'too racist' even for a genocidal apartheid state.
In my previous examination of the crumbling façade of Ivy League moral authority, I documented the systematic targeting of students who dared question America's unwavering support for Israeli policies. The pattern was clear but incomplete. Now, as prestigious universities like Yale reveal new depths of institutional cowardice, the picture sharpens into focus.
When War Criminals Receive the Red Carpet
The latest chapter in this ongoing disgrace unfolded at Yale University, where administrators welcomed Itamar Ben-Gvir—Israel's National Security Minister with a criminal record so extensive that, as one judge remarked, "We had to change the ink on the printer." Or as some would say: so racist that he turned out to be too racist even for a genocidal apartheid state, having been convicted for inciting racism in Israel itself. This is also a man whose relationship with his wife began when he was 26 and she was merely 15—a disturbing detail that further illuminates his moral character and again underlines the common denominator among the cabal of powerful vassals protected by US imperialism: they love to prey on little children.
This is the man Yale deemed worthy of its platform—a figure who just days before had publicly advocated bombing food and aid depots in Gaza, escalating the deliberate starvation of a captive civilian population. The invitation came amid what Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem has termed the "manufacturing of famine," describing Israel's actions in Gaza as "the war crime of starvation."
B’Tselem also published shocking revelations that Ben-Gvir ordered his soldiers to livestream the torture and rapes of Palestinian detainees directly to his personal computer. This gruesome detail, reported in a mainstream Israeli publication, reveals the true character of the individual Yale University chose to legitimize with its ‘prestigious’ platform.
When approximately 200 students gathered to peacefully protest this moral abomination, Yale's response was swift and revealing: the university revoked the official status of Yale's chapter of “Students for Justice in Palestine”, citing vague, unsubstantiated claims of, here we go again: "antisemitic conduct."
When pressed for evidence of this alleged antisemitism, Yale officials could provide none. The university spokesperson "declined to provide further information" about the supposed antisemitic incidents or who had been contacted regarding disciplinary action. The accusations appear to be as substantial as morning fog—convenient in the moment but evaporating under the slightest scrutiny.
Manufacturing Victimhood, Erasing Jewish Dissent
To understand the absurdity of Yale's position, consider the evidence they and their supporters presented: a manufactured confrontation by Nathaniel Crisp, a Fox News regular who deliberately attempted to force his way through protesters' linked arms while filming the encounter, despite being told he could simply walk around the demonstration.
The Zionist propaganda outlet The New York Times wrote about it in one of its many vomit-inducing pieces about rich white ivy-league Jewish victimhood to substantiate the false claim of ‘antisemitism’. For those with strong stomachs, you can read it here.
This performative victimhood was immediately seized upon by Justice Department officials and amplified across right-wing media. Meanwhile, conspicuously absent from this narrative was a critical detail: Orthodox Jewish students were among those leading the protests against Ben-Gvir, carrying signs declaring "Judaism forbids Israel" and "The State of Israel does not represent world Jewry."
“The orthodoxy demanded on campuses is not respect for Jewish people—it is unquestioning allegiance to a foreign government's colonialism and genocidal erasure of a people based on false notions of ‘race’ ”
The Controlled Demolition of Academic Freedom
The pattern repeats with mechanical predictability: a university welcomes figures who openly advocate for war crimes, students exercise their constitutional right to protest, administrators manufacture claims of “antisemitism” — not against Semites (i.e., Arabs), but privileged whites with ancestors once converted to Judaism and who endorse colonialism — while ignoring Jewish participation in the protests, and the institution punishes dissenters while shielding those who promote violence.
Meanwhile, what goes unmentioned in polite academic circles is the reality of what Ben-Gvir represents. Again, this is a man who reportedly ordered soldiers to livestream the torture of Palestinian detainees directly to his personal computer. A man who skipped mandatory military service yet now orchestrates the brutal machinery of occupation. A man whose relationship with his wife began when he was 26 and she was 15.
The Unspoken Truth About Campus "Antisemitism"
What Yale and other Ivy League institutions desperately want to obscure is the fundamental distinction between antisemitism and criticism of state policy. They deliberately conflate the two because the truth is inconvenient: some of the most passionate critics of Israeli actions are themselves Jewish. We just interviewed one of them: Maura Finkelstein.
The orthodoxy demanded on campuses is not respect for Jewish people—it is unquestioning allegiance to a foreign government's colonialism and genocidal erasure of a people based on false notions of “race”. Yale's decision to punish students for protesting a literal convicted terrorist supporter while providing him a prestigious platform reveals the institution's true priorities.
The Controlled Demolition of Gaza, The Destruction of Academic Credibility
As Yale administrators were punishing students for peaceful protest, Israeli forces were continuing what can only be described as the controlled demolition of Gaza. Video footage shows tanks and heavy machinery systematically destroying civilian infrastructure. Journalists attempting to document these actions continue to be targeted— almost 200 Palestinian journalists have been killed, many in what appear to be targeted strikes.
Most recently, Palestinian journalist Saeed Amin Abu Hassanein, his wife, and their young daughter Sareh were killed in an Israeli airstrike targeting their tent in central Gaza. Weeks earlier, Drop Site contributor Hossam Shabbat was killed in a targeted strike on his vehicle. The message is clear: bearing witness is itself a capital offense.
The Bipartisan Assault on Campus Speech
While the Trump administration has escalated the assault on free speech to unprecedented levels, the groundwork was laid during previous administrations. The institutional reflex to shield Israel from criticism transcends party lines, revealing a rare point of consensus in America's polarized political landscape.
Universities that once positioned themselves as bastions of critical thinking have revealed themselves as enforcers of geopolitical orthodoxy. What's striking about Yale's response is not its uniqueness but its typicality. Similar scenes have played out at Harvard, Columbia, MIT, and dozens of other ‘prestigious’ institutions.
Foreign Students: Stay Away
For parents in China, India, the Middle East, Africa, and beyond weighing where to educate their children, the calculus has fundamentally changed. The question is no longer which American university offers the most prestigious credential, but whether any American university can be trusted to:
Protect your child's basic constitutional rights
Foster genuine critical thinking rather than enforced orthodoxy
Value their physical safety and legal standing over institutional relationships with donors and (foreign) government entities
Provide a genuinely world-class education rather than indoctrination in imperial ideology
The evidence suggests the answer to all four questions is increasingly "no."
The Rise of Alternative Academic Centers
As American universities voluntarily surrender their moral authority, academic centers in Asia, Africa, and elsewhere continue their steady ascent. Chinese universities have methodically built world-class research facilities without demanding total submissiveness to a foreign genocidal entity.

For the first time in generations, the global flow of academic talent has begun to reverse. Faculty who value genuine academic freedom are voting with their feet, accepting positions at institutions where criticizing government policy doesn't trigger institutional retaliation.
The Verdict of History
When future historians chronicle the decline of the American Empire, they will identify this moment—when universities abandoned their fundamental mission to protect free inquiry in favor of protecting the reputations of war criminals—as the point of no return.
The irony is palpable: institutions that built their global reputations on promises of critical thinking and intellectual freedom are now systematically destroying those reputations through their own cowardice.
The mask hasn't merely slipped—it has fallen away completely. Yale's message to the world is unmistakable: we welcome those who advocate bombing aid depots but will punish students who object to such advocacy.
Parents worldwide should take heed. American universities are telling you exactly who they are and what they value. Believe them.
- Karim
* To increase the visibility of BettBeat Media, your restack of this article would be greatly appreciated.
Your support today helps us maintain our founding principle: quality analysis available to everyone, regardless of financial means. Honor the path our early supporters have blazed by becoming a paid subscriber.
Central American and Salvadoran oligarchs linked to death squads have attended Ivy League schools going back 60 years. Stanford and Chicago ran Pinochet’s programs. Berkeley ran Indonesian atrocities. Biden bragged about his Harvard bureaucracy. The institutional goal is to perpetuate impunity by laundering reputations through “prestigious” degrees, normalizing ties to abusive regimes, and both siding reperations in academic jargon.
This is a truly loathsome and despicable little “man”. As for the “prestigious” Yale, Gladwyn d’Souza made an excellent point.